Hello Experts,
we are facing an issue of departure timing and lane timing as follows:
through SAP TM there is a standard time and distance between 2 points.
the main issue that there is a truck ban that requires more distance to be covered and time if the departure time of truck happens within specific timing.
E.G.: 6 A.M Till 12:00 AM trip time increase by 4 hours due to truck ban in some areas.
Is there a solution for this
Dear Experts,
We're implementing some enhancements in SAP TM 9.0 to set the system to define transportation routes considering the geographical locations of each delivey point. We set the geographic coordinates for each unity, but the system is not considering the righ orientation for each stage.
Could someone give more information about this process?
Thanks a lot
Domênico Meneguzzi
We're implementing some enhancements in SAP TM 9.0 to set the system to define transportation routes considering the geographical locations of each delivey point, including the transportation zones.
We understand the the system should create a route considering the locations of each delivery point (stages), defining the itinerary according to the geographical locations even creating the FO manually.
We've made some tests identifing that the system generates right transportation route for some stages, but not for others. We need to make sure the system will generate the righ transportation route when we create the FO manually.
Thanks for having some supporte.
Domênico M.
Hi people,
in shipment when I put deliveries I can see them in screen for planning:
I know that I can change layout here via icon. But is there any chance to add own "Z" field and fill it with value? If I show technical names:
there is a structure V56I_DLNT_VIEW. But I didn't find where to extend it and fill it with own value (I need to add an address of special partner from delivery).
Thank you.
David
We havethescenariosbelow:
-Transportwithdriver andvehicles.
In this modeis not generateda documentCTRC(CT-e),because the costof the driveris fixedandthevehicle isan assetof the company.
-ChauffeurTransportationthirdandown vehicle.
In this modeonlytheshuttle service andbilledtothe driver,which hasaclosedpriceandemitsaNCat the endof the month,sotoothere is noCTRC(CT-e)involved.
Due tothesescenariosdo nothavea documentCTRC(CT-e)involvedandusedwhenthetransport anddirected byaforeigncarrierandthatand treatedat the entrancewhen you havesomedifferenceorvariationin transport,the need arises fora controlof thedifferencesthat occurregarding thetransport andthevariablesthat occurwithin themonth(forthecaseswherenoemitstheCTRC(CT-e).
E.g.ownVehiclewithdriverCLT.
Ina0.50centfreightkg,in the casebelow4exits:
Note1–200kg –3/10/2016
Note2–300kg-3/16/2016
Note3–400kg-3/20/2016
Note4–100kg-3/25/2016
1000kg*0.50=R$-500.00infreight.
+
Toll(sum ofgrades)–R$-50.00
Fuel (sum of grades) – R$-150.00
The total value ofnotesand expenses-R$-700.00.
*In this case as theSAPwillidentifyandknowthevalue that wasprovisionedfreightexpense(0.20-kg).
*How to treatthevariablecosts(u.s,fuel,tires,maintenance,etc.),since italways havevariables.
*Aswe don't haveaCT-andin this casehe's notreportsline by line of serviceperformedforthatintime to bringit out of theheldand shoot downthe planso notable tofitineachone of thenotes,astheSAPdeals withthis point.
E.g.Vehicleownchauffeur.
Ina0.50centfreightkg,in the casebelow4exits:
Note1–200kg –3/10/2016
Note2–300kg-3/16/2016
Note3–400kg-3/20/2016
Note4–100kg-3/25/2016
1000kg*0.50=R$-500.00infreight.
+
Toll(sum ofgrades)–R$-50.00
Fuel (sum of grades) – R$-150.00
The total value ofnotesand expenses-R$-700.00.
*Driver hasacontract with the companywhich hasamonthlyfixed costclosed bycontract.
*In this case as theSAPwillidentifyandknowthevalue that wasprovisionedfreightexpense(0.20-kg).
*How to treatthevariablecosts(u.s,fuel,tires,maintenance,etc.),since italways havevariables.
* As we don't have a CT-and in this case he's not reports line by line of service performed for that in time to bring it out of the held and shoot down the plan so not able to fit in each one of the Bills that exceeded, as the SAP deals with this point.
Hello,
is there any restriction to run TM 9.3 in combination with eWM 9.2? The append of the OSS-Note 1738013 is not quite clear to this topic. Thanks for Info,
Kai Duchene
Hi all I am doing Domestic Outbound Scenario.
From ERP system I went through SPRO --> Integration with other SAP components --> ----> Activated transfer of sales documents.
I also have assigned output type TRS0 to the same.
When I create the sales order output type TRS0 triggered.
But it is in "not processed state"
When I try to resend I get message "No communication data defined for medium 8".
Any thoughts how to fix this.
Hello Experts,
I am facing an issue in SAP TM 9.0 working under LSP scenario.
We are trying to change the ordering party on TRQ - Forwarding Order due to incorrect entry. The system is issuing out an error.
The main issue that the Forwarding Order is confirmed. Is there a way out to change the partner while order is confirmed. Or can we return the forwarding order to the status of not confirmed.
Is there any background report which delinks the Freight units with failed delivery creation ( Confirmation result is 05) from corresponding FO's ?
So most of use know the standard numbering for freight orders using the 61XXXXXX series (example: 610029467).
We have been asked by our developers to consider using apha characters in the freight order ID - something like 61XYZNNNNN where N is a number (example: 61XYZ29467). Has to do with some complications with our EWM interface in a direct load scenario (long story here, EWM initiates the load, sends the TOR / freight order # to TM, TM records the freight order after-the-fact).
My gut reaction is that this change introduces unnecessary risk on the TM side as there are a lot of unknowns. Will TM behave "normally" with a freight order 61XYX29467? Will carriers be able to process and accept a tender this way? Will the EDI / VAN networks be able to accept orders with alpha characters? How will the Collaboration Portal behave? Any issues with settlement on the ECC side? How much will users be inconvenienced using POWL's that may not sort "high to low" in the conventional fashion? Etc. Etc.
Has anyone ever tried this?
I've been in the SAP space a long time and I do not ever recall trying to use alpha characters on transaction records. Master data, sure (materials, cost centers....). But not transactions.
Thanks in advance!
Mac McLarin
Hi all,
Our customer wants to manage order changes in TM: when a planned FU is changed (date change, quantity change, etc), an indicator will be marked.
To do so, we would like to use the Change Controller settings.
But the difficulty is managing changes coming from the TRQ vs system changes.
For example, when a delivery is created, the DTR is created and the FU is updated with dates/times from the delivery: we don't want that to trigger the indicator.
Do you have any suggestions/recommendations on identifying changes from a TRQ vs system changes vs delivery creation?
Thanks in advance.
Hello gurus!
We have a problema, we have enhancement 0scm_tm_sfir_ptc datasource, but the extractor duplicate date, We need some fields from /SCMTMS/D_TCHRGE Somebody can helpme. thanks.
Hi ,
We are trying to implement load planning on TM 9.3 Versi0n.
We have maintained all the basic settings for load Planning.
Issue # 1
The below link speaks about Resource Configurator
Issue # 2
Hi All,
We are trying to implement load planning on TM 9.3 Version.
We have maintained all the basic settings for load Planning.
1) I created 3D layouts for load plan and added the colors, context menu.
2) We created Load planning settings in NWBC and assigned to Planning profile
3) We maintained weight /volume related information in Resources( Trucks)
Issue # 1
The below link speaks about Resource Configuration
We have installed SAP Visual business 2.1 Also.
Please find the below screen.
Thanks to All in Advance,
Ajay
Hello Team,
Is there any possibility to create one time BP and later on use it in FB ?
We have a scenario where contact person of a LSP changes frequently and it is not fixed. Email is sent to that contact person.
We thought to use concept called one time BP in TM like we have in ECC ( one time customer or one time vendor).
Any proposal is welcome.
Partha
Dear Sir
Pls provide the T-code that how to get the mass PDF in SAP without making earlier spools .
Regards
Hmanshu
Hello Experts,
I am implementing TM 9.3 and we don't have PI in our landscape. I have configured ECC and TM with web service configuration for consumer proxy - SLO_TransportationRequestSUITERequest_Out using tx - SOAMANAGER and configured ECC to launch output TRS0 successfully. But sales order message didn't transferred to TM, when I see TRS0 output processing log I got below message
--
Message No. LCR002
The system could not find a business system identification for the current client 300 in the system ED1 in the Landscape Directory.
Check that the data for the client is correctly maintained in the Landscape Directory. The client must be an instance of class SAP_BCClient. Using an association of type SAP_BusinessSystemViewedBCClient, an instance of class SAP_BusinessSystem must be assigned to the client.
--
Is there anything I missed here?
How to tie TRS0 output to use web service proxy interface SLO_TransportationRequestSUITERequest_Out for sales order transfer?
Thanks,
Venu
Hi Experts,
I need your assistance on how to mass upload freight agreement. Is there any BAPI/Class that I can use to upload the details? And also can we upload freight agreement data using the Excel Integration in the GUI? If so, can you share the steps on how to do it?
Many thanks.
Hi there,
I am currently trying to figure out the incompatibility settings. They are a bit of a mystery to me.
I would like to use incompatibilities to exclude certain transshipment locations from being considered during the planning optimization, or the generating of transportation proposals respectively.
Setup example:
Origin location: A
Destination location: B
Transshipment locations: C,D,E
Three routes:
A-C-B
A-D-B
A-E-B
A-C-B is the only proposal I would like to see during the planning of the Freight Unit.
Is it possible to block the proposals containing transshipment locations D and E via incompatibility settings?
If yes, how would I achieve that?
I tried to set up two conditions; one containing the Shipper BP (which is the origin location A) and the other containing the transshipment locations D and E.
As you may have guessed, that didn't work.
Or is there another way to get to the same result?
Ideally, this should be possible with master data and no or very few config changes.
Thank you for your help in advance.
Regards,
Adrian
Hi,
We are using TM on Hana and are considering to build views on the hana db as source for some reports.
Our Team is new to TM and I am not sure if this approach is a good one.
What do you think? I am happy for any advice.
Thank you